Public-Sector Expenditures and Utilization of Home Care Services in Canada: Exploring the Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A number of factors can influence the resources devoted to home care and the use of home care services. The needs of an aging population for continuing care after discharge from hospital; an evolving model of health care delivery and the search for more cost effective modes of treatment can result in increased expenditures and use of home care services. This study attempts to compare changes in expenditures and utilization of home care services by asking the following key questions: - What is the level of expenditures for publicly funded home care in Canada and how has it changed over time? - How do changes in public home care expenditures compare to changes in the number of government-subsidized home care users? Information from Public Accounts, special tabulations from Health Ministries and annual reports of provincial/territorial Workers' Compensation Boards are used to estimate the level of public home care expenditures from 1994-1995 to 2003-2004. As well, the first three cycles of the National Population Health Survey (1994-1995, 1996-1997 and 1998-1999) and the first two cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey (2000-2001 [Cycle 1.1] and 2003 [Cycle 2.1]) are used to estimate the number of government-sponsored home care users. Whenever possible, home care is broken down into home health care (nursing care and health services) and home support (personal care, housework, meals, shopping and respite care). In 2003-2004, total public home care spending in Canada is estimated to have been $3.4 billion in current dollars. Real per capita (in dollars of 1997) total public spending on home care in Canada is estimated to have been $93.60 in 2003-2004, an average annual growth of 6.1% from the 1994-1995 level. On the other hand, the number of users of government-subsidized home care services per 1,000 population was estimated at 26.1 in 2003, an average annual increase of only 1.0% from the 1994-1995 level. The fact that per capita spending on home care increased annually, on average, by 5.1 percentage points more than the number of users suggests that, in general, each home care user consumed more resources in 2003 than he or she did a decade previously. Moreover, for selected jurisdictions where home care data can be split between home health care and home support, the share of home health within home care expenditures increased, on average, from 43.3% in 1995-1996 to 48.6% in 2003-2004. Notwithstanding data limitations, the fact that home health care accounts for an increasing share of home care services suggests a gradual shift in the model of home care delivery. This should permit incapacitated clients to stay relatively safe at home, with the effect of preventing, delaying or substituting for long-term care or acute care alternatives; which could potentially turn into cost savings for the Canadian health care system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.018 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".