MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2269439161 · doi:10.1111/cpf.12290

Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on cytokines in peripheral blood for healthy participants: a prospective, single‐blinded Study

2015· article· en· W2269439161 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicExercise and Physiological Responses
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineBlinded studyStimulationPeripheralProspective cohort studyDouble blindedFunctional electrical stimulationNeuromuscular transmissionPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAnesthesiaPhysical therapyInternal medicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Introduction The effect of exercise on cytokines may improve muscle strength. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a muscle‐preserving therapy that benefits patients unable to participate in active exercise. How NMES alters cytokines is unclear. The aim of this study was to study the effects of 1 NMES session on cytokines associated with protein metabolism during exercise. Methods We evaluated the effects of NMES on IL‐1, IL‐6, IL‐10 and TNF‐α levels in peripheral blood. Participants received NMES to bilateral lower extremity muscles (quadriceps, tibialis anterior, gastrocnemius) for 30 min. Blood samples immediately pre‐ and post‐NMES were drawn at 15‐min intervals to 2‐h follow‐up, and the mean values of pre‐NMES levels were compared to peak and trough post‐NMES levels. For cytokines with significant changes, we conducted a repeated‐measures linear regression analysis. We also measured post‐NMES lactate and creatine kinase levels. Results We enrolled nine eligible participants. There was a significant increase in peak IL‐6 from the mean pre‐NMES value [0·65 (0·89) to 1·04 (0·89) pg ml −1 , P = 0·001] and a significant decrease in trough IL‐1 [0·08 (0·07) to 0·02 (0·02) pg ml −1 , P = 0·041] and TNF‐α [2·42 (0·54) to 2·16 (0·59) pg ml −1 , P = 0·021]. In repeated‐measures regression analysis, we identified significantly higher mean IL‐6 values throughout the full 120 min post‐NMES period, and a significantly higher mean IL‐1 value at 30 min post‐NMES. There were no significant differences in peak IL‐10, trough IL‐6, lactate, or creatine kinase values. Conclusions In nine healthy humans, 30 min of NMES was temporally associated with changes in cytokines similar to the effects of active exercise and may mediate NMES' observed effects on reducing muscle weakness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.119
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it