MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Expression and localization of connexin 43 in glioblastoma

2008· article· en· W2269649366 on OpenAlexaff
Peter V. Gould, Sylvine Carrondo Cottin, Manuel Caruso, Léo Cantin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnexins and lens biology
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de QuébecHôpital de l'Enfant-Jésus
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConnexinBystander effectGap junctionCell cultureCancer researchU87GlioblastomaBiologyCell biologyImmunologyGeneticsIntracellular

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The bystander effect is essential to the success of the Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (TK)/gancyclovir (GCV) strategy for cancer therapy. It consists of the transfer of phosphorylated GCV from TK+ cells to neighbouring TK− cells via gap junctions made up of connexin molecules. Down‐regulation and/or perinuclear localization of connexins should decrease the efficacy of TK/GCV treatment. The status of Cx43, the connexin expressed in astrocytes, in glioblastoma is unclear. In this study we have evaluated Cx43 expression, localization and functionality in glioblastoma cell lines, biopsies and primary cell cultures. In three glioblastoma cell lines, Cx43 was the major connexin subtype, and accumulated mainly in a perinuclear location. Nevertheless, gap junction permeability was preserved and a strong bystander effect was seen. Cx43 expression was observed in 77% (57/74) of glioblastoma biopsies and seven of eight primary cell cultures derived from surgical resection. Four of seven cultures showed cytoplasmic localization of Cx43 with preservation of gap junction permeability. These results suggest that glioblastoma is a suitable candidate for the TK/GCV approach. Supported by the CTECM/FRSQ/CIHR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicConnexins and lens biologyFrench-language works237,207