Right ventricular wall microvascular response to increased pulmonary artery pressure with particular reference to age of onset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Patients with congenital heart disease who have a morphological right ventricle (RV) serving as a systemic ventricle have an increased incidence of RV dysfunction. A different structural response of micro‐vessels to increased stress in the RV wall is a possible mechanism for this dysfunction. We examined this possibility by measuring the volume of myocardium perfused by arteries less than 200μm in lumen diameter (V) 7 weeks after a 5mg/kg IV injection of monocrotaline in three 2‐week old and three 18‐week old pigs. This information was obtained by use of 3D micro‐CT of transmural segments (~ 2cm 3 ) of the RV wall. The table provides the average values of V (mm 3 /mm 2 ± SD). Pulmonary artery pressures in the mature, treated pigs were 35±6 mmHg and in the juvenile were 25±2 mmHg. V did not differ from control in the treated 2.5‐month old pigs but trended down in the 6‐month old pigs. We conclude that the volume of myocardium perfused by an arteriole in the RV wall may be an indicator of the perfusion reserve available to the microcirculation in response to increased wall stress. A more definitive answer would require delayed study of the early onset treatment group at the age of 6 months. (Supported in part by NIH grant EB000305)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".