MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2269701027 · doi:10.25071/1718-4657.36560

Incorporeal Encounters and Affective Relationality in Krzysztof Kieslowski’s The Double Life of Véronique

2010· article· en· W2269701027 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntersections conference journal · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrilogySensibilityIrrational numberArtLiteraturePsychoanalysisAestheticsPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Krzysztof Kieslowski’s own words, his 1991 film, The Double Life of Véronique, is a “film …about sensibility, presentiments and relationships that are difficult to name, that are irrational ....[It’s about] something that doesn’t exist in the picture alone or in the music alone” (Stok 1993:34). This film, produced in Poland and France, along with his French-produced Three Colours Trilogy of the early 1990s, constitutes the final installment of this Polish-born director’s distinguished career. Over his thirty-year career of directing films and documentaries, Kieslowski repeatedly returned to a particular problematic to which most of his work, includingThe Double Life of Véronique, could be seen as a response. Set within a particular cultural andpolitical history of Europe, Kieslowski’s films sought to express a response to the problematic oflife, and its paradoxical, immanent and yet differential relationship with death, non-life or whatis other than human.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it