MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2269944508

Notizen zu Pamphilus : note

2002· article· en· W2269944508 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bengt Löfstedt

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Classica : Proceedings of the Classical Association of South Africa · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval Literature and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyOrder (exchange)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

J.B. Hall hat bekanntlich in einer Reihe von Aufsatzen in den Studi Medievali die sog. Bedier-Methode in der Textkritik scharf und witzig kritisiert. Zwei seiner abschreckenden Beispiele von Texten, die nach dieser Methode herausgegeben sind, enstammen Toronto Medieval Latin Texts. Der Generalredaktor dieser Serie ist A.G. Rigg, und er schreibt im Vorwort dieser Editionen u.a.: 'Editions in this series are usually based on one MS only, with a minimum of textual apparatus; emendations are made only where the text fails to make sense, not in order to restore the author's original version. The effect is to produce a scribal version of the text.'

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Classica : Proceedings of the Classical Association of South AfricaSame topicMedieval Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207