MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2269983853 · doi:10.82308/40022

Lock-based concurrency control for XML

2006· dissertation· en· W2269983853 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2006
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceXML validationEfficient XML InterchangeStreaming XMLXML databaseXML Schema EditorXML EncryptionDatabaseXML SignatureNon-lock concurrency controlDocument Structure DescriptionConcurrency controlProgramming languageMultiversion concurrency controlXMLDistributed concurrency controlWorld Wide WebDatabase transaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As XML gains popularity as the standard data representation model, there is a need to store, retrieve and update XML data efficiently. McXml is a native XML database system that has been developed at McGill University and represents XML data as trees. McXML supports both read-only queries and six different kinds of update operations. To support concurrent access to documents in the McXML database, we propose a concurrency control protocol called LockX which applies locking to the nodes in the XML tree. LockX maximizes concurrency by considering the semantics of McXML's read and write operations in its design. We evaluate the performance of LockX as we vary factors such as the structure of the XML document and the proportion of read operations in transactions. We also evaluate LockX's performance on the XMark benchmark [16] after extending it with suitable update operations [13]. Finally, we compare LockX's performance with two snapshot-based concurrency control protocols (SnaX, OptiX) that provide a committed snapshot of the data for client operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicAdvanced Database Systems and QueriesFrench-language works237,207