MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

<sup>8</sup>Li<i>β</i>-NMR study of epitaxial Li<sub><i>x</i></sub>CoO<sub>2</sub>films

2014· article· en· W2270088541 on OpenAlexaff
Jun Sugiyama, Masashi Harada, Hideki Oki, Susumu Shiraki, Taro Hitosugi, Oren Ofer, Z. Salman, Qinghai Song, D Wang, H. Saadaoui, G. D. Morris, K. H. Chow, W. A. MacFarlane, R. F. Kiefl

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvancements in Battery Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British ColumbiaTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitaxyIonDiffusionAtmospheric temperature rangeMaterials scienceRelaxation (psychology)NMR spectra databaseAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Thin filmLattice (music)Condensed matter physicsSpectral linePhase (matter)ElectrodeChemistryPhysical chemistryNanotechnologyThermodynamicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to investigate the diffusive motion of Li + in a thin film electrode material for Li-ion batteries, we have measured β -NMR spectra of 8 Li + ions implanted into epitaxial films of Li 0.7 CoO 2 and LiCoO 2 in the temperature range between 10 and 310 K. Below 100 K, the spin-lattice relaxation rate (1/ T 1 ) in the Li 0.7 CoO 2 film increased with decreasing temperature, indicating the appearance and evolution of localized magnetic moments, as observed with μ + SR. As temperature is increased from 100 K, 1/ T 1 starts to increase above ~ 200 K, where both Li- NMR and μ + SR also sensed an increase in 1/ T 1 due to Li-diffusion. Interestingly, such diffusive behavior was found to depend on the implantation energy, possibly because the surface of the film is decomposed due to chemical instability of the Li 0.7 CoO 2 phase in air. Such diffusive behavior was not observed for the LiCoO 2 film up to 310 K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicAdvancements in Battery MaterialsFrench-language works237,207