The Design and Development of Novel Cooking and Heating Products for Irish Older Adults: A Real Health Need
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The world’s population is ageing; researchers have an increasingly important role to play \nin innovating new products, appliances and services to allow for better everyday living conditions of \nthis ageing demographic. Health, wellbeing and age in place needs are of particular importance in \nIreland as research has revealed that as a nation we are living longer in ill health (McGill, 2009). \nThe most fundamental domestic products to health, wellbeing and in the promotion of ageing in place \nare cooking and heating products, however little design research has been carried out in this area. \nTo inquire into the context of usability in older adults, ethnographic research has been conducted \nwithin the homes of participant older adults to obtain a true insight into user needs in cooking and \nheating products. This involved a yearlong (Spring, Summer, Autumn and Winter) study with forty \nparticipants over the age of 70 years across Ireland and from various socio-economic groups. From \nthis study prototypes will be created and user tested by older adults to determine appropriate design \ncriteria for these products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it