MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2270803733

Screening Afua To Find Exclusivity In Invasive Disease-Causing Haemophilus Influenzae Strains

2013· article· en· W2270803733 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Stefan Ceklic

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of undergraduate research in Alberta · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMachine Learning in Bioinformatics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMicrobiologyHaemophilus influenzaeSerotypeVirulenceVirologyGenePathogenPrimer (cosmetics)genomic DNAGeneticsAntibiotics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION Haemophilus influenza (H. influenzae) is a Gram-negative bacterial human pathogen. Serotype B strains contain a polysaccharide capsule, which aids their virulence though protection from phagocytosis. These strains were primarily responsible for invasive disease, such as meningitis, until the introduction of a conjugate capsular vaccine against serotype B strains in the 1980’s. Recently, non-encapsulated, non-typeable strains have emerged and begun causing invasive disease, which was previously very uncommon. They have generally caused localized upper respiratory infections due to the inability of the bacterium to cross epithelial layers. Recent experiments have revealed that the periplasmic protein AfuA binds glucose-6-phosphate (G6P ) , which is only found in host cytoplasm. This finding suggests that pathogens with AfuA are capable of entering cells and growing within the host cytoplasm. We hypothesized that serotype B strains would be ubiquitously afuA positive and non-typeable strains would be afuA negative. The objective of this study is to investigate if afuA is found only in invasive strains by screening the gene in the lab’s collection of H. influenzae strains . METHODS Genomic DNA was extracted from 41 H. influenzae strains. Three H. influenzae afuA genes were found on NCBI and were aligned using MAFFT. One set of forward and reverse primer probes were designed to anneal in conserved regions of the gene. A secondary forward primer was used for backup in negative and ambiguous results. Genomic DNA was PCR amplified with the probes and subsequently ran on 1% agarose gels. Amplification of the ferric binding protein A gene was used as a positive control. PCR products were sent for sequencing on a case-to-case basis to alleviate any ambiguity in interpretation. RESULTS The project identified that 34 out of 41 tested H. influenzae were afuA positive. Specifically, 9 out of 10 non-typeable strains were positive, 18 out of 23 serotype B strains were positive, and 7 out of 8 unknown types were positive. Contradictory to our hypotheses, several serotype B strains were afuA negative and most non-typeable strains were afuA positive. AfuA is evidently not exclusive to serotype B strains. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS Since AfuA was found in most non-typeable strains and missing in several serotype B strain, it is unlikely that AfuA alone is a pre-requisite for invasive disease, nor that afuA is exclusive to only invasive strains. Future research should explore a novel relationship between AfuA and H. influenzae strains. We alternatively propose that AfuA may be correlated to the inclination to cause disease in both encapsulated and capsule deficient strains, but is not an absolute prerequisite. Another hypothesis is that AfuA is required for the utilization of various sugar phosphates that might be available from the degradation of capsular polysaccharides or other extracellular materials. Thus, in addition to probing the prevalence of the afuA gene, functional transport studies should be pursued to further elucidate AfuA’s role in H. influenzae .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of undergraduate research in AlbertaSame topicMachine Learning in BioinformaticsFrench-language works237,207