MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2270880423

自然与科技的对立与融合——Amaya Arzuaga的2007秋冬系列

2007· article· zh· W2270880423 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
辛草

Bibliographic record

Venue流行色 · 2007
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Amaya Arzuaga,作为西班牙著名的设计师之一,1992年完成在马德里Polite cnica大学的时装设计学业后就加入了Elipse的家族事业。两年后她开办了自己的公司并发布了她的第一个个人系列。1995年和1996年她在巴塞罗那、马德里、巴黎和纽约展示了她的个人系列。1997年她成为第一位被选中参加伦敦时装周的西班牙女设计师。在伦敦成功后,她又被邀请与Tom Ford、Miuccia、Prada、Dolce&Gabbana以及Alberta Ferretti一起参加米兰时装周展示2003年的春夏系列。从那时起,这位年轻的设计师就一直在米兰的T台上光彩熠熠。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue流行色→Same topicCultural Industries and Urban Development→French-language works237,207→