Immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) in cats - part 1: a review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In contrast to dogs, immune-mediated hemolytic anemia is rarely seen in cats and occurs most often secondary to an underlying infectious, neoplastic or inflammatory process Clinical symptoms are often vague and are caused by severe anemia and the effect of hypoxia on organ systems Laboratory abnormalities in cats with IMHA are comparable to those seen in dogs, with the exception of spherocytes, which are difficult to identify in cats The diagnosis is based on hemolytic anemia in combination with a positive 'true' autoagglutination and/or a positive Coombs test A search for underlying causes should always be performed and, because infections with hemotrophic mycoplasma species are the most Important underlying cause for IMHA in cats, a polymerase chain reaction test to detect these bacteria should be carried out Treatment consists of immunosuppressive drugs, providing oxygen-carrying solutions, treating underlying causes and supportive care In cats, IMHA carries a better prognosis than in dogs, although relapses are seen in equal frequency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.030 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".