MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2271115344 · doi:10.17428/rmi.v8i2.606

Las representaciones sociales que tienen los migrantes “temporales” respecto a los habitantes de Saint-Rémi, Quebec

2015· article· es· W2271115344 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aaraón Díaz Mendiburo

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Health and Social Inequalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAINTLatin AmericansSociologyIndividualismGender studiesGovernment (linguistics)Social representationPerspective (graphical)Representation (politics)EthnologyHumanitiesPolitical scienceSocial scienceArtArt historyPhilosophyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El gobierno de México envía desde 1974 a Canadá a hombres y mujeres bajo el Pro-grama de Trabajadores Agrícolas Temporales (PTAT) y, desde 2009, a través del Pro-yecto Piloto (PP). Esta investigación, desde una visión antropológica, emplea la teoría de las representaciones sociales y el multimétodo conformado por palabras evocativas, entrevistas semiestructuradas, escala de valores y observación participante para deve-lar cuales son las representaciones que los hombres migrantes tienen respecto a los habitantes de Saint-Rémi, Quebec, y comprender cómo se gestan y cómo son las rela-ciones entre ambos grupos. Las nociones estructurales de las representaciones fueron: respecto a los canadienses-quebequenses de individualistas, excluyentes y racistas; la de los latinoamericanos-quebequenses de solidarios; la del espacio canadiense como un sitio de oportunidades; y la del trabajo agrícola como difícil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0060.006
Open science0.0060.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.475
GPT teacher head0.616
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicPublic Health and Social InequalitiesFrench-language works237,207