MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2271115344 · doi:10.17428/rmi.v8i2.606

Las representaciones sociales que tienen los migrantes “temporales” respecto a los habitantes de Saint-Rémi, Quebec

2015· article· es· W2271115344 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aaraón Díaz Mendiburo

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Health and Social Inequalities
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSAINTLatin AmericansSociologyIndividualismGender studiesGovernment (linguistics)Social representationPerspective (graphical)Representation (politics)EthnologyHumanitiesPolitical scienceSocial scienceArtArt historyPhilosophyPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El gobierno de México envía desde 1974 a Canadá a hombres y mujeres bajo el Pro-grama de Trabajadores Agrícolas Temporales (PTAT) y, desde 2009, a través del Pro-yecto Piloto (PP). Esta investigación, desde una visión antropológica, emplea la teoría de las representaciones sociales y el multimétodo conformado por palabras evocativas, entrevistas semiestructuradas, escala de valores y observación participante para deve-lar cuales son las representaciones que los hombres migrantes tienen respecto a los habitantes de Saint-Rémi, Quebec, y comprender cómo se gestan y cómo son las rela-ciones entre ambos grupos. Las nociones estructurales de las representaciones fueron: respecto a los canadienses-quebequenses de individualistas, excluyentes y racistas; la de los latinoamericanos-quebequenses de solidarios; la del espacio canadiense como un sitio de oportunidades; y la del trabajo agrícola como difícil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.475
GPT teacher head0.616
Teacher spread0.141 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicPublic Health and Social InequalitiesFrench-language works237,207