MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2271304073 · doi:10.14288/1.0088593

Ecology of the microbiotic crust of the antelope-brush (Purshia tridentata) shrub steppe of the South Okanagan, British Columbia

2009· article· en· W2271304073 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lynne Beryl Atwood

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiocrusts and Microbial Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEcologySteppeShrubGeographyArchaeologyForestryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis examines two aspects of the microbiotic crust in the antelope-brush (Purshia tridentata (Pursh) D.C.) shrub steppe of the South Okanagan, British Columbia: (1) relationships between the extent, distribution, and composition of the microbiotic crust, soil texture, and primary grazer (wildlife versus livestock), and; (2) effect of the microbiotic crust on soil moisture content and loss. The floral characteristics of the microbiotic crust of five antelope-brush sites are summarised in Chapter I. Differences in species richness and extent, lifeform composition, and quality of the microbiotic crust are described. Preliminary studies identified differences in the floral characteristics of the antelope-brush sites and discussed these differences in relation to soil texture and type of primary grazer. No conclusive relationships between microbiotic crust species numbers, lifeform composition, crust extent, or moss thickness were identified. It was concluded that microbiotic crust colonisation was influenced by soil surface stability and stability may be affected by physical disturbance, such as livestock grazing, or by the mechanical composition and degree of aggregation of the soil. Two of the sites examined were the focus of the soil moisture study presented in Chapter II. The study addressed three questions: 1. Does the microbiotic crust influence soil water content and loss on the antelope-brush sites? 2. Does the soil moisture effect differ with microbiotic crust species? 3. Is the role of the microbiotic crust on soil water more important than influences from other ecosystem components? Soil moisture content was uniformly sampled after two rain events and two factors (shrub and microbiotic crust) were tested in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Shrub cover was included in the experimental design to account for the possible effects of shading and hydraulic lift. Data were analysed with the general linear model and both analysis of variance (ANOVA) and repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance (repeated measures MANOVA) were used. The study determined plots with microbiotic crust at the sample point (crusted plots) reduced infiltration initially, but soils beneath a crust retained the moisture for longer periods than areas sampled in bare soil (non-crusted plots). Shrub cover had little relevance to surface soil moisture conditions other than its effect on microbiotic crust characteristics. Soils beneath lichen crusts received more precipitation and soils beneath moss had better retention of soil water. The water retention ability of soils beneath moss increased with moss thickness. The effect of surrounding plot conditions varied, but generally the conditions at the sample point were paramount. If the sample point was covered by a microbiotic crust (crusted plots), the positive effect on soil moisture was enhanced by surrounding crust characteristics. However, if the sample point was bare (non-crusted plots) the ability of the surrounding microbiotic crust to moderate soil moisture varied. Vascular plant and litter cover moderated moisture conditions in bare soil, but were not as effective as the microbiotic crust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.143
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicBiocrusts and Microbial EcologyFrench-language works237,207