MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2271371215 · doi:10.1515/zpch-2015-0603

Can we Observe Gas Phase Nucleation at the Molecular Level?

2015· article· en· W2271371215 on OpenAlex
Jorge J. Ferreiro, Thomas E. Gartmann, Bernhard Schläppi, Ruth Signorell

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicnanoparticles nucleation surface interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNucleationPropaneGas phaseMass spectrumChemical physicsPhase (matter)Molecular dynamicsMaterials scienceChemistryMass spectrometryThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryPhysicsComputational chemistryChromatographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We propose and discuss an experiment for the study of neutral gas phase nucleation on a molecular level using propane as the condensable gas. The experiment combines a uniform Laval expansion with soft mass spectrometric detection. The uniform Laval expansion allows nucleation experiments under well-defined conditions while the mass spectrometric detection provides molecular-level information on the molecular aggregates formed. It is discussed how one could observe the onset of nucleation and retrieve the size of the critical nucleus from the mass spectra.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it