MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2271382055

Financing Foreign Affiliates: An Overview of the Canadian Proposals and the Rules in Selected Countries

2008· article· en· W2271382055 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sandra Slaats

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicTaxation and Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNoticeLegislationIncome taxTreatyNegotiationConventionInternational taxationFederal budgetInternational tradeWithholding taxBusinessPolitical scienceFinanceDouble taxationEconomic policyEconomicsTax reformLawDirect tax
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the policy aspects of the March 2007 federal budget proposals and the May 2007 revised proposals concerning the deductibility of interest expense relating to certain foreign investments. It also provides an overview of recent developments concerning the measurement and taxation of foreign income in a number of other countries. Readers should note that this article was submitted for publication in mid-September 2007. Soon after, on September 21, 2007, the Canadian and US governments concluded their negotiations on the fifth protocol to the Canada-US income tax convention, which will amend the treaty provisions on source-country taxation of certain interest income. Then, on October 2, 2007, the Department of Finance released draft legislation to implement the new interest deductibility rules, followed by a notice of ways and means motion tabled in the House of Commons on November 13, 2007. These developments are noted but not discussed in detail in the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.622
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicTaxation and Legal IssuesFrench-language works237,207