MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2271407426

16. Efficient Cavitation Detection Technology for Optimizing Hydro Turbine Operation and Maintenance

2004· article· en· W2271407426 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Youssef Mossoba

Bibliographic record

VenueTunnelling and Underground Space Technology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCavitationTurbineVibrationField (mathematics)Mechanical engineeringHydraulic turbinesMarine engineeringEngineeringShock (circulatory)Computer scienceAcousticsMathematicsPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cavitation damages are the result of repeated collapses of transient vapour cavities. When the micro-jets or shock waves of water vapour implosions hit the metal surface of the runner blades, they leave a signature of vibrations at very high frequencies. By measuring vibrations at strategic points on the hydroelectric unit, important data can be retrieved. These data are then mathematically treated in order to isolate vibrations resulting directly of cavitation erosions from other noises inherent with turbine operation. Hydro-Quebec has spent considerable effort in studying cavitation detection using the vibratory approach. In recent years a technology transfer activity took place from lab and field development to field measurement applications. In this paper we will principally describe recent field results. We will explain how these data are valuable for optimal operation aiming at maximizing availability and minimizing maintenance. We will also explain how transferring the technology from IREQ, Hydro-Quebec's research institute to Hydro-Quebec Generation Group helped adapting the method to the field needs. After developing highly cavitation resistant materials and the Scompi robot for cavitation repairs, Hydro-Quebec has spent considerable effort in cavitation detection by the vibratory method. When this technology reached field implementation, the different applications have emerged into: Measuring relative cavitation aggressiveness; Measuring absolute cavitation aggressiveness; Monitoring cavitation aggressiveness. Many uses could be resulting from these applications: Identification of optimal operating conditions for minimizing cavitation damages; Comparison between two machines, one that has been modified and the other not; or comparison between before and after a modification on a machine; Predicting the time of performing repairs, i.e. optimizing repairs planning; Except for an initial inspection, eliminating future cavitation inspections; Verification of model cavitation predictions; Performing acceptance tests. The cavitation detection technology applied on machines with cavitation problems or on new, upgraded or rehabilitated machines can minimize maintenance costs and operating revenue losses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.561
Threshold uncertainty score0.750

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTunnelling and Underground Space TechnologySame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207