Bibliographic record
Abstract
The object of this thesis is to examine the circumstances in which the 'rorriancero fronterizo' made its appearance and to attempt to determine when and where these romances were composed, and their relation to history. In order to understand the peculiar climate in which these 'romances' were probably written, an outline is given of the history of Castilla in the XV century and of the history of the kingdom of Granada during the same period. From this study emerges a picture of life in the frontier, which sets the scene for the 'romances fronterizos'. The word 'romance' itself alludes, at first, to the vernacular, and later to narrative verse written in octosyllables. The 'romances antiguos' in general are fragments of older epics. The peculiarity about the 'romances fronterizos' is that they do not refer back to epic poems. According to some critics they sprang from the immediate impact of the episodes they narrate. This was R. Menendez Pidal's position. Deyermond combines composition by a single poet with collaborative authorship. A. Rodriguez-Monino appears to accept Nucio's statement that the romances he printed were obtained by word of mouth. Others situate the composition at the royal court or at a later date. In order to arrive at a conclusion regarding these points, we have studied 19 'romances'. While it has been possible to situate each of them in a given historical situation, they do not all adhere strictly to historic reality. Some, starting from a real happening, dramatize the moment with romanesque details. Others, of which the outstanding exponent is ''Abenamar, Abenamar...", starting from a true historical moment (here the incursion of Juan II in Granada in 1431) present an entirely fictitious episode. And yet others present history as it happened. Comparing the 'romances' with the presentation of the historical moment by the Chronicles, we try to determine the relationship between them. We find that the 'romances fronterizos' that we have analyzed form a distinctive group with characteristics peculiar to them but not necessarily found all in each of them. Their common denominator is their theme: they are all narrations of border episodes that focus on a moment of particular dramatic impact. The most important link that unites the 'romances fronterizos' and separates them from the other 'romances' is the spirit of the frontier, a projection of the history of the frontier that finds expression in the attitude of the poet towards life in that frontier which he shares with the Muslims. This co-existence has created an understanding of the problems of the enemy and an attitude towards him that is reflected in the poems. This group of 'romances' were, we believe, written in the small courts of the nobles along the frontier by professional poets. They were the product of the historical moment and of literary tradition and are a perfect expression of a unique atmosphere in a given historical setting.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".