MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2271518265 · doi:10.1049/iet-est.2015.0030

State‐of‐charge and state‐of‐health estimation with state constraints and current sensor bias correction for electrified powertrain vehicle batteries

2016· article· en· W2271518265 on OpenAlexafffund
Pawel Malysz, Ran Gu, Jin Ye, Yang Hong, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Electrical Systems in Transportation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersFiat Chrysler AutomobilesCanada Excellence Research Chairs, Government of CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsKalman filterState of chargeElectric vehicleBattery (electricity)State (computer science)PowertrainControl theory (sociology)Extended Kalman filterCompensation (psychology)State of healthCurrent (fluid)Driving cycleCurrent sensorVoltageEstimationEngineeringComputer scienceAlgorithmElectrical engineeringPower (physics)TorquePhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pragmatic approaches are proposed to enhance battery state estimation using Kalman filter (KF) and extended KF. Notable novelties introduced include: the use of state/parameter constraints, asymmetric equivalent circuit model behaviour, inclusion of nominal models, and current sensor measurement bias estimation and compensation. The so‐called delta parameters are estimated to handle cell variations, aging, and online deviation of parameters. Strategic simplifications that enable the use of traditional KF algorithm are described. Unique filter structures are presented for state‐of‐charge and state‐of‐health estimation, the latter focuses on capacity and impedance estimation. The performance of the proposed approaches is demonstrated on experimental drive‐cycle data designed for electric vehicle (EV) and hybrid EV applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Electrical Systems in TransportationSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207