MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2271599577 · doi:10.5539/mas.v10n1p200

Determining Aquifers and Bedrock of Qaen Plain by the Resistance Measurement Method

2016· article· en· W2271599577 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Farnusch Hajizadeh, Saeed Reza Akhondi

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBedrockGeologyAquiferDepth soundingVertical electrical soundingDrainageElectrical resistivity and conductivityCoastal plainDrainage system (geomorphology)GeomorphologyHydrology (agriculture)GroundwaterGeotechnical engineeringPaleontologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this study is to determine aquifers and bedrock of Qaen plain by the resistance measurement method. Using symmetrical Schlumberger electrode array, the most common method to detect underground water, Qaen plain was located in the west of Khanik village situated in the North East of drainage basinto the West of Aliabad village situated in the West of drainage basinat 159 electric sounding stations along 13 profiles under the geoelectrical operation. Profiles were along the south East-North West. At most, the half of the Electrode distance was 500 meters in the Schlumberger array. Interpretation of geoelectric sounding was done using the Partial and computer compliancemethod (using ipi2win Software). The obtained results of the Geoelectrical operation were interpreted and drawn by resistivity section, resistivity profiles, the apparent resistivity maps of the different flow lines (AB including 200, 600, and 1000 meters), and isobath map of the rock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207