MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2271805363

A Compliance System for the Kyoto Protocol

2001· article· en· W2271805363 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rose Gregory

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of New South Wales law journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNuclear and radioactivity studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKyoto ProtocolCompliance (psychology)ConventionProtocol (science)United Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeMontreal ProtocolPlan (archaeology)Project commissioningAction planPublishingPolitical scienceClimate changeLawEngineeringManagementEconomicsMeteorologyGeographyOzone layer
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Kyoto Protocol have taken steps to develop a robust compliance regime. Under the Buenos Aires Plan of Action (BAPA), adopted at the Fourth Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC, agreed on steps to prepare for the Kyoto Protocol, including development of a compliance system and to implement the parts of the BAPA dealing with Kyoto Protocol compliance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.343

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of New South Wales law journalSame topicNuclear and radioactivity studiesFrench-language works237,207