Les liens entre la société, la nature et la technique durant les derniers 200 ans : analyse dans deux vallées françaises
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cette étude, nous nous sommes intéressés à la coévolution de la nature et de nos sociétés durant les 200 dernières années en prenant comme observables l’évolution morphologique des cours d’eau, le développement de l’urbanisation, les aménagements hydrauliques et la démographie locale. Nous mettons en évidence que la coévolution de l’environnement et de la société a été accélérée par le développement technique qui a décuplé les mutations et la complexité du système. La technique fabrique la Nature et la Société telles que nous les connaissons actuellement dans la vallée du Rhône. Mais la Nature n’est pas un élément passif et participe à la construction de nos sociétés et de nos techniques. C’est en partie une crise « naturelle » qui en 1856 a favorisé la migration des populations et accentué la volonté de domestiquer la nature. Indirectement, cette crise a probablement participé à la maturation de la société industrielle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".