Soil Treatment with Fungal Agents for Control of Apothecia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum in Bean and Pea Crops
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A two-year field study was conducted to determine the effects of soil treatment with four mycoparasites and one antagonist on production of apothecia of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum under the canopy of dry bean and dry pea. Among the five species of fungi assessed, Coniothyrium minitans and Talaromyces flavus were the most effective agents for reducing carpogenic germination of sclerotia of S. sclerotiorum in bean and pea crops, whereas Tricothecium roseum and Trichoderma virens were effective only in bean, and Epicoccum purpurascens was ineffective for both crops. Treatment with C. minitans significantly reduced formation of apothecia of S. sclerotiorum in bean and pea. This study suggests that, under Canadian Prairie conditions, soil treatment with mycoparasites such as C. minitans can be an effective measure for reducing the production of ascospores, which are the primary source of inoculum for white mold of bean and sclerotinia blight of pea.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".