Towards an Intercultural Legal Theory: The Dialogical Challenge
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the article is to present to a predominantly Anglophone audience current work in French/Quebecois legal anthropology. This work attempts to build an epistemology for an intercultural legal theory and is opening up a dialogical approach to Law, which goes beyond the mere project of an intercultural legal theory. In order to do so, the article presents the LAJP's (Laboratory of Legal Anthropology of Paris) move towards a non-ethnocentric science of Law followed by a presentation of Panikkar's and Vachon's contributions on the 'dialogical method' which clarify the epistemological foundations of a pluralist approach to Law and lead to a presentation of Etienne Le Roy's theory of 'multilegalism' [multijuridisme]. The whole approach and its relevance are then illustrated through examples on the local, national and global planes in the fields of youth justice, French legal cooperation, land law and human rights and international penal law.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it