Analysis on Fengshui Theory and Urban Planning in Ancient China
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chinese traditional Fengshui theory was commonly used in ancient China in the site construction of ancient capitals, ancient cities, villages, towns, houses, and graves throughout the entire country, particularly in Southeast, Southwest, South, and Central China. Langzhong ancient city, in Sichuan Province, was the case study in this paper, which was the typical representative Fengshui city in the Southwest of China. Site selection, spatial layout, landscape, and image of this city were analyzed in depth. With the guidance of Fengshui the ancient city satisfies not only physical needs, but also environmental, psychological and aesthetic ones. This analysis concludes that, Fengshui is rich in science and aesthetic principles, as well as contains the concepts and methods of landscape ecology and urban planning. The findings provide important theories and references for the planning, construction, and environmental improvement of modern cities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it