MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2272509840 · doi:10.4000/questes.2088

À la marge : éléments bibliographiques

2006· article· fr· W2272509840 on OpenAlexaff
Julien Abed

Bibliographic record

VenueQuestes · 2006
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accarie, Maurice, « Poésie, fine amor et amour courtois. La course à la marginalité dans la civilisation féodale », dans Théâtre, littérature et société au Moyen Âge, Nice, Serre, 2004, pp. 189-221. Alexander, Jonathan James Graham, “Preliminary Marginal Drawings in Medieval Manuscripts”, dans Artistes, artisans et production artistique au Moyen Age, 3, Fabrication et consommation de l’œuvre, colloque international organisé par le Centre national de la recherche scientifique, Université de Re...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0120.024
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0130.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuestesSame topicDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningFrench-language works237,207