MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2272703140

Generalized Estimating Equations and Gaussian Estimation in Longitudinal Data Analysis

2011· article· en· W2272703140 on OpenAlex
Xuemao Zhang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsMathematicsGeneralized estimating equationEstimatorEstimating equationsStatisticsGaussianAutocorrelationRegression analysisMarginal modelApplied mathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this dissertation, we first develop a Gaussian estimation procedure for the estimation of regression parameters in correlated (longitudinal) binary response data using working correlation matrix and compare this method with the GEE (generalized estimating equations) method and the weighted GEE method. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is derived for estimating the regression parameters from the Gaussian likelihood estimating equations for known correlation parameters. The correlation parameters of the working correlation matrix are estimated by the method of moments. Consistency properties of the estimators are discussed. A simulation comparison of efficiency of the Gaussian estimates and the GEE estimates of the regression parameters shows that the Gaussian estimates using the unstructured correlation matrix of the responses for a subject are, in general, more efficient than those by the other methods compared. The next best are the Gaussian estimates using the general autocorrelation structure. Two data sets are analyzed and a discussion is given. The main advantage of GEE is its asymptotic unbiased estimation of the marginal regression coefficients even if the correlation structure is misspecified. However, the technique requires that the sample size should be large. In this dissertation, two bias corrected GEE estimators of the regression parameters in longitudinal data are proposed when the sample size is small. Simulations show that the proposed methods do well in reducing bias and have, in general, higher efficiency than the GEE estimates. Two examples are analyzed and a discussion is given. The current GEE method focuses on the modeling of the working correlation matrix assuming a known variance function. However, Wang and Lin (2005) showed that if the variance function is misspecified, the correct choice of the correlation structure may not necessarily improve estimation efficiency for the regression parameters. In this dissertation, we propose a GEE approach to estimate the variance parameters when the form of the variance function is known. This estimation approach borrows the idea of Davidian and Carroll (1987) by solving a non-linear regression problem where residuals are regarded as the responses and the variance function is regarded as the regression function. Simulations show that the proposed method performs as well as the modified pseudolikelihood approach developed by Wang and Zhao (2007).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.869

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.198
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.160 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it