MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2272838295

Dielectric behavior of transformer oil when contaminated and/or fortified with nanoparticles

2014· article· en· W2272838295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mahshid Farzaneh Dehkordi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Transformer Diagnostics and Insulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineral oilMaterials sciencePartial dischargeTransformerDielectricTransformer oilNanoparticleLiquid dielectricPermittivityElectrical equipmentComposite materialSynthetic oilHigh voltageVoltageEnvironmental scienceElectrical engineeringMetallurgyOptoelectronicsEngineeringBase oilNanotechnology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liquid insulation, a key element in the transmission and distribution of electric power, guarantees safe operation from power transformers, cables, circuit breakers etc. by successfully transferring heat from the equipment as well as acting as the electrical insulating medium. In liquid insulation, mineral oil is widely used as an insulating medium in power industries. In the first part of this research project the impact of the aging of mineral oil on partial discharge is investigated as well as on other chemical and physical properties. For different accelerated aging times, different experiment are set up so that the aforementioned impact is measured along with several other parameters. Investigations are also performed on new oil to provide baseline comparison. The aim of this part of the research is to find relationships between partial discharge inception voltage (PDIV) and the other parameters of oil to do a suitable interpretation between them during aging time. Recently, interest has been growing in enhancing the insulating properties of mineral oil by adding nanoparticles. The literature survey revealed the promising impact of TiC>2 nanoparticles. In the second part of this project, the dielectric performance of mineral oil was therefore investigated by adding different concentrations of TiO2 nanoparticles (from 0.003 g/ml to 0.01 g/ml) using ultrasonic methods. All the investigation tests were performed at different temperatures ranging from -47 to 47°C to correspond with environmental temperature changes in Canada. The results were compared in terms of breakdown and dielectric properties, such as permittivity and resistivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.526
Threshold uncertainty score0.256

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Transformer Diagnostics and InsulationFrench-language works237,207