Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans the biological, physical, and social sciences.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Topic
- Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
- Field
- Environmental Science
- Canadian institutions
- University of VictoriaUniversity of British Columbia
- Funders
- Canada Research Chairs
- Keywords
- Cognitive reframingCornerstoneFutures contractValue (mathematics)OddsEnvironmental ethicsIntrinsic value (animal ethics)Law and economicsSociologyEnvironmental policyEpistemologyFocus (optics)Positive economicsSocial psychologyPsychologyEconomicsEnvironmental resource managementComputer sciencePhilosophyGeography
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes