MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2272942233 · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/1/1/016306

Dilemma on the crystal structure of CaCu<sub>3</sub>Ti<sub>4</sub>O<sub>12</sub>

2014· article· en· W2272942233 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMaterials Research Express · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDielectric properties of ceramics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystal structureDilemmaMaterials scienceCrystallographyCrystal (programming language)ChemistryComputer scienceGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structure of CaCu3Ti4O12 has been studied using high resolution synchrotron radiation based x-ray powder diffraction. The observed x-ray diffraction patterns show pronounced Bragg peak asymmetries which should not be present assuming the commonly accepted cubic crystal structure of CaCu3Ti4O12 described by the space group Im-3. Several structural models are discussed. The first model assumes a coexistence of two phases with the cubic symmetry (both space group Im-3) and different lattice constants. The next models are based on subgroups of the cubic space group Im-3. The best agreement with the experimental data is found for the two-phase cubic model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it