MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2272966365 · doi:10.1063/1.2900157

10 Years of RXTE Monitoring of Five Anomalous X-Ray Pulsars

2008· article· en· W2272966365 on OpenAlexaff
Rim Dib, V. M. Kaspi, F. P. Gavriil, C. Bassa, Z. Wang, A. Cumming, V. M. Kaspi

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetarPulsarNeutron starPhysicsAstrophysicsContext (archaeology)Radiative transferX-ray pulsarStatic timing analysisRotation (mathematics)AstronomyFlux (metallurgy)Computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Anomalous X‐ray Pulsars are believed to be magnetars: young, isolated neutron stars powered by a large magnetic energy reservoir. Here, we review recent observational progress on five anomalous X‐ray pulsars based on a 10‐year long monitoring project done using the Rossi X‐Ray Timing Explorer (RXTE). In particular, we discuss timing behavior including glitches, radiative variability including bursts, pulsed flux changes, and pulse profile changes. We compare the timing properties to those of regular rotation‐powered pulsars, and we consider the observed radiative phenomena in the context of the magnetar model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIP conference proceedingsSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207