MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2273079990 · doi:10.18806/tesl.v18i2.914

Reviews/Compte Rendus

2001· article· fr· W2273079990 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Virginia Sauve, John Sivell

Bibliographic record

VenueTESL Canada Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman auditory perception and evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of International Science and EngineeringUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsLinguisticsPsychologySociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Friesen and Block have given us a reader with a real difference! Creating Meaning is a thoughtfully prepared, well-integrated text of special value for learners who need to walk the bridge between ESLjEFL and academic preparation. What makes it especially appealing is its Canadian content, which is also of high interest and current relevance. The topics are diverse, ranging from family and culture, to emotional intelligence, to people who make a difference. All are authentic readings from a variety of credible sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.8450.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTESL Canada JournalSame topicHuman auditory perception and evaluationFrench-language works237,207