Entrenched Instability: The Community Implications of Flexibility in British Columbia's Northern Interior
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Economic restructuring of British Columbia's forestry sector, stimulated by the recession in the 1980s, has challenged the viability of the post-war institutions and economic landscape. This period marked an end the expansion of the forestry sector as industry and the province worked to contend with a number of global and local pressures. Restructuring instigated processes whereby engrained institutional arrangements were dismantled and redefined. This paper examines how forestry companies are redefining relationships at the local level, enacting flexibility outside of the mill, within communities. The analysis of case study findings from three communities explore how companies have negotiated flexibility and rationalized business practices in an effort to address uncertainty. These processes have exposed the inherent tension between companies and communities regarding relationships. Furthermore, corporate visions of 'flexible communities' ignore the structural and geographic realities embedded within resource-dependent communities. The push for flexibility within the forestry sector and resourcedependent communities has resulted in exacerbating longstanding issues of dependence, vulnerability, and disparity; a result that runs contrary to the interest of the province, resource-communities, and forestry companies. Keywords: flexibility; restructuring; resource towns; forestry; local development
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".