MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2273168708 · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.102056

FireSmart guidebook for the oil and gas industry.

2008· book· en· W2273168708 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire dynamics and safety research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum industryPetroleum engineeringFossil fuelBusinessEnvironmental scienceEngineeringWaste managementEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Protecting life, communities, watershed and soils, natural resources and infrastructure from wildfire has been Alberta Sustainable Resource Development's (SRD) priority for many decades.Since the 1990s the provincial FireSmart program has been accepted nationally as a proactive prevention program.FireSmart introduces steps to mitigate wildfire impacts while embracing the ecological role of wildfire.Wildfire is a natural process that helps maintain healthy and vibrant forests.However, uncontrolled wildfire can have a devastating impact on industrial developments.The FireSmart program recognizes this delicate balance and presents a number of innovative solutions specifically for the Oil and Gas Industry.The Partners in Protection Association^ an Alberta-based, non-profit association with multidisciplinary membership developed the, "FireSmart, Protecting Your Community from Wildfire (Second Edition)" Manual in 2003 to provide direction primarily in the development of residential homes in the wildland/urban interface.Based on the success and acceptance of its wildfire threat assessment and mitigation chapters (including forms and illustrations), the communityfocused FireSmart Manual was used as a template for the FireSmart Guidebook for the Oil and Gas Industry.The Guidebook addresses both the threat of wildfire to Oil and Gas Industry values as well as the potential liability of the oil and gas industry.This document is intended as a guide for industry planning engineers and safety program managers throughout the province.The Alberta Department of Sustainable Resource Development and the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP) have co-sponsored the Guidebook.In conjunction, CAPP has developed Best Management Practices (BMP) in recognition of the importance of protecting the oil and gas industry developments and the continuous operation of production facilities.These BMPs will (1) assist the oil and gas industries in the prevention of industry-caused wildfires; and (2) help mitigate the impact of catastrophic fires on industry infrastructure, operations, liability, personnel safety and the environment.' The Partners in Protection Association is committed to raising awareness, providing information and developing forums to address common problems that encourage initiatives to reduce the risk of fire losses and enhance safety in the wildland/ urban interface.^Alberta legislation, such as the Forest and Prairie Protection Act, Forests Act, Timber Management Regulations and Public Lands Act, is available at http://www.qp.gov.ab.ca/custom_page.cfm?page_id=34 Forest Protection Area of Alberta

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.792

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4450.353

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFire dynamics and safety researchFrench-language works237,207