MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2273169342 · doi:10.1353/ces.2015.0049

The Religions of Canada ed. by Jamie S. Scott, and: Father Achiel Delaere (1868–1939): The First Eastern Rite Redemptorist and Canada’s Ukrainian Catholic Church by Jozef de Vocht (review)

2015· article· en· W2273169342 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Myroslaw Tataryn

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian ethnic studies · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious Tourism and Spaces
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiographyUkrainianReligious studiesImmigrationHistoryFlemishRiteRite of passageSynodClassicsSociologyLawAnthropologyArt historyPolitical sciencePhilosophyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: The Religions of Canada ed. by Jamie S. Scott, and: Father Achiel Delaere (1868–1939): The First Eastern Rite Redemptorist and Canada’s Ukrainian Catholic Church by Jozef de Vocht Myroslaw Tataryn Jamie S. Scott, ed. The Religions of Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2012. 468 pp. Appendix. Index. $46.95 sc. Jozef de Vocht, CSSR. Father Achiel Delaere (1868–1939): The First Eastern Rite Redemptorist and Canada’s Ukrainian Catholic Church. Yorkton, SK: Gravelbooks, 2005. 325 pp. Sources. Index. $24.95 sc. Religion, identity, immigration, and assimilation are certainly phenomena that are inextricably linked with the Canadian story. The two volumes under review deal with two historical periods where this linkage was particularly formative of Canada’s history: de Vocht speaks to the late nineteenth- and early twentieth-century settlement of Ukrainians on the prairies and Scott’s edited volume addresses the contemporary scene of Canada’s religions, significantly affected by post-1960’s immigration. This latter, complex perspective is the focus of Scott’s academic volume: “The Religions of Canada attempts to trace the efforts of Canada’s different spiritual constituencies to negotiate the often-rocky terrain between slavish perpetuation of the religious ways of ‘over there’ and ‘back then’ and creative adaptation of inherited beliefs and practices to the social and cultural demands of a new life in a new world” (xvi). The biography of Achiel Delaere (originally published in Flemish in 1954) admits no such understanding of questions of identity or cultural adaptation. Although claiming to be “neither hagiography nor an edifying story” (xxi), de Vocht’s biography seldom goes beyond a hymn of praise to the man he accurately describes as having “exerted a decisive influence on the Ukrainian Catholic Church, especially in Canada” (xxi). Nonetheless, in different ways, both volumes do contribute to our understanding of how religion and religious institutions influence Canadians. The Delaere biography is a narrative hailing the “hero.” The author occasionally offers translations of archival documents (particularly from the chronicle of the Yorkton monastery); however, they are not always identified well or notated. The reader is often left trying to decipher the origin or dating of a particular citation. This problem could have been addressed by the editor, who made other corrections to the original (xix). Despite this difficulty and the hagiographic nature of the volume, it does offer insight into the period. The story of Achiel Delaere is important in the early settlement period of Ukrainians because it reveals two realities faced by the settlers: the absence of their traditional religious environment in Canada, which created an immense vacuum in their community and personal lives; and this gap could not be filled by non-Ukrainian priests because the settlers’ identity did not easily differentiate religious from ethnic identity. Scott’s volume demonstrates how more recent immigrants have [End Page 371] not experienced the former as acutely, but certainly do continue to struggle with the latter question of differentiation of identity. Unfortunately, de Vocht’s account demonstrates his own insensitivity to the issues. In fact, the book is indicative of some of the very problems with which the settlers had to struggle. Both Delaere and de Vocht regarded the settlers’ dilemma as one of religion—to be resolved by a simple adherence to the Catholic Church. Both considered issues of ethnic identification either as intrusions into what was truly important (their Catholicism) or, worse still, as manifestations of “chauvinistic nationalism” (58). The editor, Paul Laverdure, warns the reader of de Vocht’s “combative or controversial style” (xviii), but suggests that this is not reflective of Delaere himself (“De Vocht used Delaere as a stick to beat …” [xviii]). However, Delaere’s words reveal that he believed he was surrounded by enemies who must be defeated: married Ukrainian priests, the Protestants, the Seraphimites, and, perhaps initially, the first Ukrainian bishop in Canada, Nykyta Budka (172). This world of imagined conflict precludes nuance in de Vocht’s and Delaere’s assessment of the Ukrainian immigrants. References to the Ukrainians as “culturally backward” and “unsophisticated” (44), as “fanatical peasants” (97), with only a few being “true Catholics” (63) abound. Further evidence of the cultural and religious denigration suffered by the Ukrainian...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.128
Threshold uncertainty score0.257

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.010
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian ethnic studiesSame topicReligious Tourism and SpacesFrench-language works237,207