Reconhecimento de atividades suspeitas em ambiente externo via análise de vídeo infravermelho
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Surveillance has become, in the last years, something ubiquity in our society. Every day it is more notorious the presence of intelligent systems for surveillance in our everyday life. This is due to technological advances achieved in recent decades (storage and processing speed increasing, miniaturization of devices like biometric detectors and video cameras) as the constant feeling of insecurity experienced in several countries. Following the dark days of 9/11, security and surveillance became paramount. This work aims the study of techniques for the development of a surveillance system of an outdoor parking lot based on a stationary camera. Considering that in an outdoor parking lot it is very important that the surveillance is made both day and night, in this work we use an infrared camera to record images. An infrared camera allows to see objects of interest in the scene even at night. The images used for the experiments in this work were recorded by the student in Laval University campus (Canada) during an internship he held in the "Canada Research Chair in Multipolar Infrared Vision". A surveillance system based on video cameras is usually composed of three parts: (i) motion detection, (ii) tracking and (iii)event management. In this work, we use a dynamic background subtraction technique to detect motion (motion segmentation). This technique adapts to abrupt changes on the scene's illumination making the technique robust to this changes. Besides, we use ow analysis to restrict the segmentation process only to regions where we have motion in the scene. The object tracking technique used is based on a two phase cycle: prediction and correction. The events of interest which occur in the monitored area are modeled explicitly and then recognized and interpreted. The main goal of this project is to recognize suspicious events. Experimental results show that such techniques are suitable for a surveillance system for an outdoor parking lot based on a infrared stationary camera.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".