Bibliographic record
Abstract
This is to review the nature of Koguryo’s three fortresses in the Imjin River basin from the two military historical perspectives. First one was based on the period from the last quarter of the 4th century to mid-6th century when Koguryo engaged in offensive operations Horogoroo was located along the attack route of Baekje, thus it contained Baekje’s attack and played a role as an assembly area for the reserve force. Horogoroo and Dangpo fortresses were repaired so that the fortress became strongholds to control surrounding areas and supply bases. While Eundaeri fortress was disused. Second one was based on the period from the second half of the 6th century to the second half of the 7 th century when turned to defensive operations and the battles were stalemated. The three fortresses were vulnerable to attacks because the areas to the south of the fortresses were higher than the fortresses. For this reason, it seemed that Horogoroo and Dang-po fortresses were used as command posts and supply bases during the battles. It seemed, however, that Eundaeri fortress lost its defensive function and Moodeng-ri fort assumed the role of defense.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".