Effects of Ionic Strength on the Colloidal Stability and Interfacial Assembly of Hydrophobic Ethyl Cellulose Nanoparticles
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nanoparticle attachment at a fluid interface is a process that often takes place concurrently with nanoparticle aggregation in the bulk of the suspension. Here we investigate systematically the coupling of these processes with reference to the adsorption of aqueous suspensions of ethyl cellulose (EC) nanoparticles at the air-water interface. The suspension stability is optimal at neutral pH and in the absence of salt, conditions under which the electrostatic repulsion among EC nanoparticles is maximized. Nonetheless, hydrophobic attraction dominates particle-interface interactions, resulting in the irreversible adsorption of EC nanoparticles at the air-water interface. The addition of salt weakens the particle-particle and particle-interface repulsive electrostatic forces. This leads to destabilization of the suspension at ionic strengths of 0.05 M or greater but does not affect nanoparticle adsorption. The energy of adsorption, the surface tension and interface coverage at steady state, and the particle contact angle at the interface all remain unchanged by the addition of salt. These findings contribute to the fundamental understanding of colloidal systems and inform the utilization of EC nanocolloids, in particular for the stabilization of foams and emulsions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it