MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2273682452 · doi:10.14288/1.0081105

A technical and economic evaluation of run-of-mine coal transport by open channel flow

2010· article· en· W2273682452 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Murray Lytle

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoal miningChannel (broadcasting)CoalFlow (mathematics)Environmental scienceMining engineeringBusinessPetroleum engineeringWaste managementEngineeringTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recent economic recession in the free market economics of Western and Third World countries has had a negative impact on coal sales by western Canadian coal producers. Slower worldwide economic activity has reduced the demand for metallurgical and thermal coal and competition in world coal markets has increased. In response to this changing economic climate, Canadian coal producers must make their mining operations more efficient in order to retain their share of the world coal market. The Coal Mountain Mine of Byron Creek Collieries (1983) Ltd. is an open pit mine in the mountainous region of southeastern British Columbia. The mine currently transports the run-of-mine coal from the operating pits to the preparation plant in large, rear dump trucks. The current study was undertaken to investigate the economic feasibility of transporting the run-of-mine coal through near vertical, steel lined raises to an underground flume, where it would be conveyed to the preparation plant by open channel flow. An experimental program to measure the transport of run-of-mine coal through a 15.2 centimeter diameter, high density polyethylene flume was carried out. The recirculating fluid test apparatus provided data which was used to develop an equation to predict the rate of transport of coarse coal through the flume. The experimental program also measured the degradation of coal particles resulting from plug flow conveyance through a vertical, steel lined raise. The plug flow movement of coal through a 300 meter long by 1 meter diameter steel lined raise was simulated by passing 1.5 tonnes of coal through a 3 meter long by 75 centimeter diameter steel tube 100 times. The increase in coal fines resulting from this test was 3 percent by weight and the particle size degradation was restricted to the outer 2 centimeters of the coal column circumference. A computer program to model the project economics for an open pit coal mine using either a flume transport system or a truck transport system was written. The program was used to model the project financial risk by: i) generating net present value and internal rate of return frequency distributions, and ii) testing the sensitivity of the project economics to changes in selected input variables. Mine project economics were developed for the following five production and mine development cases: i) gradual development of an expanding mine ii) rapid development of an expanding mine iii) gradual development of a new mine iv) rapid development of a new mine v) replacement of coal trucks for an operating mine. In all the cases, the flume system was economically superior and was subject to less financial risk than the truck haulage system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.914
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207