MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2273812937 · doi:10.29173/mlj759

Necessarily Critical - The Adoption of a Parody Defence to Copyright Infringement in Canada

2009· article· en· W2273812937 on OpenAlexaffabout
Graham Reynolds

Bibliographic record

VenueManitoba Law Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIntellectual Property Law
Canadian institutionsMichelin (Canada)Canada Auto WorkersDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopyright infringementLaw and economicsDistribution (mathematics)Copyright lawPolitical scienceLawBusinessEconomicsIntellectual propertyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, [2001] O.J. L 167/10 at 17, art.5(3)(k) states that Member States may permit the use of copyright-protected works "for the purpose of

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.880

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0370.014
Scholarly communication0.0150.003
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0110.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueManitoba Law JournalSame topicIntellectual Property LawFrench-language works237,207