MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2273939152 · doi:10.32597/dmin/21/

The Supernatural Made Simple: an Introductory Seminar for Postmoderns in Saanich Peninsula, British Columbia

2011· dissertation· en· W2273939152 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ern Brake

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLeadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMindsetPostmodernismSubject (documents)EvangelismDoctrineSociologyHistoryReligious studiesAestheticsTheologyPhilosophyEpistemologyLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Problem. The doctrine of the state of the dead is not well understood. Popular culture and philosophy have deluged unchurched residents of the Saanich Peninsula in British Columbia, and indeed much of the world, with impressive deceptions regarding the supernatural world. Of particular concern is the increasingly pervasive postmodern mindset and its inherent resistance to traditional doctrinal preaching. Considering the strength of this deception, the treatment this subject receives in traditional evangelistic meetings is inadequate for persons newly introduced to it. Methodology. I sought to address this problem by conducting a series of experiments in evangelistic seminars using elements of popular culture to teach the truth about the nature of the supernatural world. Through trial and error, I sought to perfect a seminar that would engage the postmodern mind. This journey of discovery was guided by the theology of evangelism as outlined in chapter 2, the literature on the subject as described in chapter 3, and the results of the previous seminars as recounted in chapter 4. Results. We, as a church, reached very few hard-core postmoderns. Most of our non-Adventist guests were either postmodern-influenced seekers or Christian seekers. Although most of those we baptized were from these two groups, they still required a social connection to our church. Most of those we baptized had developed friendships within our church, or were already a part of church life. Looking back on our efforts, I realize that what I developed was how to teach postmoderns rather than how to reach postmoderns. The seminars became part of an ongoing discipleship process of the church. Conclusions. Preaching alone does not facilitate the necessary paradigm shift in a postmodern or postmodern-influenced seeker. In order to fulfill the great commission within the postmodern world, we need to combine the teaching of doctrine with the development of community. In order to be a blessing to our postmodern guests, we need a modified set of evangelistic presentations that meet seven criteria. They must (1) start with issues with which postmoderns can identify, (2) answer questions that postmoderns are asking, (3) address longings that postmoderns are feeling, (4) speak in the language that postmoderns understand, (5) paint pictures and tell stories that postmoderns want to be a part of, (6) develop community into which postmoderns are invited and feel welcome, and (7) introduce an experiment that postmoderns can try.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.675
Threshold uncertainty score0.646

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0260.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLeadership, Courage, and Heroism StudiesFrench-language works237,207