Il romanzo d'amore di Sibilla Aleramo e Dino Campana in Un <i>Viaggio Chiamato Amore. Lettere 1916-1918</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nello scambio epistolare tra Sibilla Aleramo e Dino Campana realmente avvenuto tra il 1916-1918 e edito nella raccolta Un viaggio chiamato amore dalla studiosa Bruna Conti, si riscontrano ricercate pose da innamorati che danno origine ad una storia d'amore al confine tra realtà e creazione letteraria, di cui Sibilla si rivela essere abile artefice e regista. L'intento dell'Aleramo di fare della propria esistenza un'opera d'arte unito alla colta e raffinata complicità intellettuale di Dino Campana, rendono la lettera un luogo in cui proiettare non solo il sentimento di due amanti lontani, ma anche lo spazio in cui Sibilla plasma la sua identità di amante-attrice di un dramma amoroso. La corrispondenza, quindi, come unica testimone del loro idillio realizza la fusione tra vita e arte, trasformando il carteggio Aleramo-Campana nel romanzo del loro amore.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.052 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".