Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article I try to prove, that aim of the philosophy of Albert Schweitzer is to discover real meaning of history. Important is, that his philosophical inquiry may be seen as attempt to rehab philosophical view on history which lies beyond ordinary historical purview. His life – and world affirmation are the basis of his view on historical process and decline of the Western Civilization diagnosis. Quite optimistic view, makes him understand main factors of this decline and push him to fi nd a medicine. Negative effects of mass culture and global conflict threats let him know, that science and technological progress are not able to find solutions for main human problems. So, he decided to create his own theory of the universe, which contains his worldview and lifeview in their integrity. He rejects pessimism as a negation of life and set reverence for life against it. In contrast to pessimismhe offers human independence and ability for critical thinking. His view on progress as spiritual perfection of human being makes him a heir and continuator of philosophical tradition of the Enlightenment philosophy of history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it