Courts Martial and Libel: A Waterloo Officer’s Military Career and the Contemporary Press
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Captain John Montmorency Tucker, a veteran of the Peninsular Wars and Waterloo, was twice court martialled. After the first court martial in 1815, he was sentenced to be discharged, but this was mitigated to no punishment and the prosecutor was reprimanded. The trial was reported by the Military Register , which publicly criticized the prosecutor, and a libel action against the editor soon followed. After the second court martial in 1822, Tucker was sentenced to be reprimanded, but the king, in view of the first court martial, judged him unfit for service, and he was ordered to sell his commission. The official army report of this court martial published the charges, verdict, sentence, and change of sentence with no commentary. This article examines why the cases were reported differently and the significance of the libel charge against the Military Register .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it