MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2274274928

Деятельность гражданского инженера П. П. Нарановича в Томске

2014· article· ru· W2274274928 on OpenAlex
Богданова Ольга Владимировна

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Томского государственного университета. История · 2014
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Socio-Economic Development Trends
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChapelChristian ministryQuarter (Canadian coin)Service (business)Work (physics)ManagementEngineeringSociologyLibrary scienceHistoryArt historyLawPolitical scienceArchaeologyBusiness
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Paul Naranovich was a talented Russian architect whose work had a significant influence on the socio-cultural environment of the West Siberian town in the last quarter of the XIX early XX centuries. He graduated from the Construction School in St. Petersburg in 1878, first worked in St. Petersburg, and since 1882 was directed by the Ministry of National Education to Tomsk as the chief builder of the Imperial University. In Tomsk Paul Naranovich was the author of many buildings of that period which constituted the central part of the city and its main square-Novosobornaya. But the chief merit of the architect was the construction of the First Siberian Imperial University, which he held for 12 years. The Ministry of National Education appointed Paul Naranovich the chief architect of the University. According to the projects of Alexander Bruni, Paul Naranovich built the main building of the university complex, the astronomic house and a chapel at the anatomic house. On his own projects Paul Naranovich built the University Hospital, the service at the main building, a greenhouse, dormitories, anatomic and hygienic institutions. In addition to this multi-faceted activity as the chief architect of the University Paul Naranovich performed many other duties. In 1885 he was appointed the architect of the West Siberian educational district. From 1888 he was a junior architect of Construction Department at Tomsk Provincial Council, combining it with a private practice. According to the projects of Paul Naranovich and under his supervision several buildingsforming the main square of Tomsk, the Novo-sobornaya, were built. The Theatre of Korolev and the gymnasium for men were built by Paul Naranovich on his own projects. Together with V. Khabarov, another graduate of the Academy of Arts, Paul Naranovich designed and built the house of the governor and reconstructed the house of the merchant Gadalov. For Paul Naranovich in the provincial Tomsk the eclectic style was typical, with the noticeable rationalistic aspect. Such a style is typical for dormitory building, gymnasium, the Theater of Korolev and public library. Another variant of the eclectic style with stylized elements was characteristic for such buildings as the governor's palace and the house of the merchant Gadalov. Such a diverse range of buildings of various functionalities, their location in the system of the town and their importance suggests that creativity of Paul Naranovich was fundamental in shaping the development of Tomsk in the 1880s 1890s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0060.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.026

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it