Votre ménage a-t-il changé de « boss » entre 1971 et 1981?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le nombre de femmes à la tête de leur ménage a plus que doublé entre 1971 et 1981 au Canada. Cet article examine dans quelle mesure cette augmentation est due à des modifications dans la structure des ménages (par exemple, l'augmentation du nombre de familles monoparentales) et dans quelle mesure elle est due à l'apparition en 1981 d'un nouveau concept pour identifier la personne à la tête du ménage (par exemple, dans les ménages unifamiliaux de familles principales époux-épouse sans autres personnes, plus de 340 000 épouses se sont déclarées soutien de ménage en 1981, alors qu'elles n'auraient pu se déclarer chef de ménage selon la définition de 1971). L'existence de fortes différences interprovinciales permet de supposer que l'impact du changement de concept varie en fonction des caractéristiques des ménages, des époux et des épouses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".