MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2274525175

The Significance of the Liturgical Reforms Prior to the Second Vatican Council in Light of Summorum Pontiificum

2010· article· en· W2274525175 on OpenAlex
Chad J. Glendinning

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia canonica · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTheology and Canon Law Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtEthnologySociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A la lumiere de Summorum Pontificum, permettant une plus large utilisation des livres liturgiques pre-conciliaires, l'article donne un bref apercu chronologique des reformes liturgiques plus importantes qui ont precede le Concile Vatican II. Ces initiatives legislatives du Saint-Siege - la revision des livres liturgiques, la restauration des rites liturgiques, la promotion de la musique sacree et la participation active des fideles- ont servi de precurseurs a une reforme liturgique majeure voulue par le Concile Vatican II. L'article conclut en presentant un certain nombre de principes, tires de ces sources pre-conciliaires, pour illustrer que la plupart des pretendues innovations de Sacrosanctum Concilium possedent en fait un solide precedent historique et legislatif. Ces principes doivent donc etre observes dans toutes les celebrations de la forma extraordinaria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it