Year in review 2015: Interstitial lung disease, pulmonary vascular disease, pulmonary function, sleep and ventilation, cystic fibrosis and paediatric lung disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The diagnosis and treatment of interstitial lung diseases (ILD) have undergone revolution in 2015, with the new antifibrotic treatments pirfenidone and nintedanib now incorporated into clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).1 This follows their pivotal phase III trials in 20142, 3 that showed, for the first time, slowing of disease progression in this devastatingly fatal disease. While pirfenidone had been licenced in Japan since 2008 and Europe since 2011, both drugs gained Federal Drug Administration (FDA) approval in the United States in 2014, heralding a new era in the management of IPF worldwide. This change in the paradigm of IPF management prompted a comprehensive and timely review series this year in Respirology, focusing on the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIP),4-8 an important subset of ILD. In this series, Jacob et al.5 highlight the three cardinal features of classical usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan as honeycomb cysts, traction bronchiectasis and volume loss of the lung parenchyma. They also discuss the current conundrum of ‘possible UIP’: as clinicians, we are currently faced with guidelines that recommend a surgical lung biopsy for further characterization if the HRCT is not classical. However, in reality, only a minority of patients undergo this procedure. With Fell et al.9 showing in patients without definite honeycomb change, that an age greater than 70 years has a positive predictive value of 95% for UIP on lung biopsy; and sub-analysis from the INPULSIS trials showing that patients with possible UIP respond equally well to nintedanib, the clinical utility of the term ‘possible UIP’ comes into question. In a comprehensive review of the histopathology of IIP, Tabaj et al.7 also highlight the challenge posed on histopathology by the ‘certainty’ categories of UIP based on key features as stated in the 2011 IPF guidelines.10 In practice, while these categories provide a common lexicon for clinical trial enrolment, they may lead to confusion and/or oversimplification. These authors note the potential for transbronchial cyrobiopsy, a new diagnostic procedure for ILD patients, to obtain larger tissue fragments with little reported artefact than previously possible with conventional transbronchial biopsy. With promising results demonstrated in the diagnosis of ILD, this may become a feature of future ILD diagnostic algorithms.11 In a critical review of the revised IIP classification,12 Neurohr et al.6 emphasize the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to IIP diagnosis, integrating clinical, physiological, radiological and histopathological data. They also discuss the importance of the newly recognized category of ‘unclassifiable IIPs’ introduced in the 2013 IIP update, in which a disease behaviour classification has been proposed to allow a pragmatic management approach with suggested goals and monitoring strategies. With the rapid changes occurring in ILD diagnosis and management, this review series encapsulates the current standards and complexities involved in the care of ILD patients. The lack of standardized approach to IPF diagnosis and management is highlighted by Troy et al.13 who report a wide variation in diagnostic and therapeutic approach to IPF in 144 Australian and New Zealand respiratory physicians surveyed in 1999 and again in 2012–2013. In the latter survey, 34% of physicians responded that they would refer patients to subspecialist ILD clinics or multidisciplinary meetings and 33% would commence corticosteroids and/or azathioprine. While no antifibrotic therapies were available at the time of this survey, the results of the PANTHER-IPF trial14 showing increased harm with this immunosuppressive regime were available, and thus, they illustrate the fast pace at which IPF management is changing and delay with which recommendations are being translated to clinical practice. The authors argue that there is a need to standardize the approach to diagnosis and treatment of IPF patients. The need for novel tools to enhance our diagnosis of ILDs is apparent and was explored by Bhattachryya et al.15 who reported an algorithm to visually transform the breath sounds of patients with diffuse parenchymal lung disease compared with normal subjects. While this study showed 100% accuracy in differentiating the normal (n = 20) from the abnormal (n = 8), the accompanying editorial by Joshi16 concludes that this algorithm is unlikely to be of any additional value above traditional auscultation. Their transformation of sound to an interpretable visual image, however, shows ingenuity and promise for future medical and educational applications. Diagnostic challenges facing respiratory physicians extend to the granulomatous lung diseases (GLD) with a diverse range of aetiologies reported. In a single-centre retrospective study of 190 GLD patients with surgical lung biopsies, Nazarullah et al.17 found that infectious aetiologies were common (54.7%) and associated with necrosis at biopsy. The most common non-infectious aetiology was, unsurprisingly, sarcoidosis that was associated with the classical non-necrotizing granulomas in comparatively healthy patients. As many GLD are diagnosed without lung biopsy, it is unlikely that this study provides a true representation of the aetiology of GLD. It does, however, provide a basis for assessing GLD when biopsy is required. Accurate ILD diagnosis is critical to prognosis and management; however, it is clear that disease heterogeneity with regard to both the clinical course and treatment response exists and remains a significant clinical challenge. Research into the pathogenesis of IPF, the commonest of the IIPs, has resulted in the expansion of identified biomarkers with potential utility for screening, diagnosis, prognostication and monitoring. Hambly et al.8 review this highly relevant topic of personalized medicine for the IPF patient in a timely review in this journal. While the exact pathological process by which IPF develops remains elusive, there has been a shift in the pathogenic paradigm from inflammation-driven fibrogenesis to aberrant wound healing following repetitive alveolar epithelial cell injury. This view is supported by increased risk of death and hospitalization with immunosuppressive therapy in the PANTHER-IPF trial.14 It is clear that the progressive fibrosis in IPF is dependent on a complex plethora of intricate signalling pathways and effector cells, increasing the difficulty of developing reliable biomarkers and effective treatments. One proposed mechanism for the development of pulmonary fibrosis is mutations in the telomerase enzymes. Telomeres are located at the end of chromosomes, acting as disposable buffers that become truncated during cell division. Telomere shortening is a hallmark of ageing, and at a critical length, cell renewal capacity becomes limited. Mutations in telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) and telomerase RNA component (TERC) have been reported in 8–15% of familial pulmonary fibrosis,18, 19 establishing a pathogenic link between short telomeres and pulmonary fibrosis. Dai et al.20 report six patients with novel heterozygous mutations in the telomerase genes (two in TERC and four in TERT) in 100 sporadic IPF patients from Nanjing, China. These authors also confirm that telomere length is shorter in IPF than healthy aged-matched controls and is shortest in those with a TERT/TERC mutation. In a further study, the same authors21 demonstrate that shorter telomere length is associated with increased mortality, independent of age, gender, forced vital capacity (FVC) or diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco). As noted by Chambers22 in the accompanying editorial, there appears to be a strong causal link between short telomeres and premature senescence of cells in IPF pathogenesis, supporting the potential utility for peripheral blood telomere length as a diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarker. Short telomeres however are not specific for the diagnosis of IPF and have also been identified in the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) population.23 Nonetheless, these studies provide additional weight to the telomere-IPF hypothesis. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the promoter region of the Mucin 5B (MUC5B) gene have been consistently observed in familial and sporadic IPF.24 In genome-wide association studies in American and European cohorts, it is the dominant genetic finding and is noted in 31–42% of patients with IPF. Polymorphisms have also been found in 19–20% of control subjects,25-29 although their prevalence varies with ethnicity. Horimasu et al.30 have shown in a Japanese population of 384 patients, that SNPs in MUC5B were more common in IPF (3.4%) compared with non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP) (1.7%) and healthy controls (0.8%). This association however was not as strong as the German counterparts where MUC5B occurred in 33.1% in IPF, 27.4% in NSIP and 4.3% in healthy controls. This study highlights the importance in considering ethnic differences for future potential biomarkers. The search for biomarkers extends to sarcoidosis: Plate et al.31 the of a in the gene promoter in SNPs in the have been shown to promoter and In this study, the authors found that this was common in sarcoidosis compared with controls and that increased may be associated with from the development of This same has also been found to of and they that the of in may be to in as the not between and As there was no however, these are and further The clinical trials in IPF a new era in IPF however, they also highlight the during the from development to the of new drugs into clinical care In a review series by and et emphasize that increasing into complex and disease have resulted in the need for highly and greater As the of development and traditional for the authors that there is a need for new with between and the may be to specific while to and novel While these as well as and the development of new is to the in to in approval and et illustrate that this for which approval in Japan in not In the United to pirfenidone was only approval in the results of with is a need to timely to new which is only possible a shift in approval and of the review to to new which IPF patients a trial of antifibrotic As with most clinical the in INPULSIS and were highly and as by the of a review and a in the lack of it is to the of these those in the clinical trial cohorts, as there are in this disease. et to this in a it is to provide a therapeutic for patients with patients or patients without true IPF, the authors note that there is an view to the of these to the specific from the INPULSIS trials has suggested that nintedanib is equally the of disease age and ‘possible It is important to note that no patients with IPF were in these studies and to this be by the lack of supporting and potential for In an to therapy for patients with IPF, et the of pirfenidone with in a retrospective study of IPF patients from a Japanese in this study had Japanese 3 or disease to of and a in of in the The authors treatment with and pirfenidone (n = was associated with a and progression compared with pirfenidone (n = of progression While this study is and the were not with regard to disease there is for the of in IPF. and in the accompanying editorial the that this is an important the current in the management of progressive disease and the of in the management of ILD extend to pneumonia with et showing that rapid may be an for patients with This study of patients patients into based on the of peripheral blood (n = compared with a normal peripheral (n = in the had of need for and with disease. In this were at the time of clinical with no treatment while the control a course with only patient It is important to note that there are no trials treatment in and both of this study are not with many While this study of therapy based on disease and response to is as this study was and short with the of in this disease where the of treatment is in disease and associated lung disease. In a retrospective of patients with et found a of diverse lung and These with had a of in this are a prognostic with ILD have than controls to a of that may the course of disease. et in patients with IPF an and found that most patients of the at than and only in They also found that was not to the of the lung disease as by pulmonary with Research and capacity The authors that the of may in disease compared with disease. In a study in et the and of patients with ILD lung They report and of and with of and This is to that found in The authors that it is that is a to the capacity demonstrated in ILD patients. these in the accompanying editorial, the importance of as in may to and of The of and the basis of in ILD are as therapies slowing disease progression may in IPF patients The a of is also to for the and to While it has been in little the and of in ILD patients. While guidelines based on patients the need for the of a practice in ILD patients who are by and was by et These authors found to patients, there was a significant in the ILD with of patients further on their with a change in of This would have resulted in of patients at an and the of a practice in ILD. It has been an year in ILD with significant not only in the diagnosis and treatment also in the of and biomarkers as well as however, is only the and we with the new that be in the year to are abnormal between the pulmonary and the pulmonary and to have been reported in to in may in or in the are associated with it was to that et reported a association in a population of patients a Japanese study reported an association of in only of patients with As et the and the retrospective of their study, with of the it the as to there is a prevalence in and patients. and a comprehensive on a of patients with or without that pulmonary of patients being for have remains a in patients. in those with of pulmonary the diagnosis while important prognostic with regard to associated with is that pulmonary therapy may be the and may allow patients to tissue disease associated pulmonary a diverse of with pathogenesis and response to The most is to immunosuppressive therapy and shows a response to pulmonary and tissue may respond to and/or pulmonary is et the of patients with by with patients with idiopathic patients were had and although they to be is the of disease in the is that surgical patients with is for medical patients, although the American of editorial by and this in the of a study reported by et In this study, patients with pneumonia were compared with controls. there were significant differences in for these there a of and and pulmonary in the pneumonia The of the increased risk the first diagnosis is important and to that observed in surgical patients. It remains the of the study by et would be the same with a than has been associated with an that as a The authors of and editorial recommend that patients with pneumonia as American of there is no supporting treatment of pulmonary associated with chronic respiratory diseases guidelines recommend that treatment is at the lung disease In the European however, it is that patients with be to and for and clinical It is of that et report an in in 70 patients with and as with the The study had as it was and However, it a potential of in the study in patients with of and to the need for a the first of pulmonary years has become and the for the diagnosis and management of respiratory disease. While the in have the of lung to and many new as well as of to to pulmonary in and disease. In in 2015, the forced was to pulmonary in a of healthy of The of the is that it is and not respiratory which to be in of any While the has been in a of studies to the of the study by and was that it in of of the of specific to also be The study reported that had and than during resulted in a compared with those not while no of or was The lung is to in as it has been shown to be a reliable more than for changes in lung In a study by and the of on by the breath was healthy as well as those with fibrosis the authors demonstrated that when is to the lung volume of the the was The authors a to for this of However, is now to this the accuracy of The breath also be to of in the peripheral for where is or this et was associated with of in with who were on for age, gender, disease and demonstrated that was with while was associated with and While these are and the of and in peripheral in the were and further is to any In 2014, an review series that in respiratory and medicine to the is the most lung for a lung In 2015, this series was with the of four that highlighted the diagnostic lung for and as well as the of for respiratory disease diagnosis and In the review by and the authors the non-infectious pulmonary associated with increased respiratory and diffusion capacity and they lung in both and They also discuss the complex pathogenic and in diffusion capacity associated with respiratory and and the of the lung to the and heterogeneity of disease in the review by and highlighted the of a lung to provide a comprehensive of lung the of patients. forced volume in remains important for assessing the of monitoring lung and is a strong of However, is to the development and progression of disease. As additional as computed the breath and may additional to and is associated with a of changes to lung and that are well In the review by and the authors discuss is the of and weight loss on of pulmonary The authors also the and of a of lung lung volume volume of respiratory and that be to the potential of or in with respiratory and an of for the and of respiratory disease Accurate of this are a important of medical and the review an of the to new and for respiratory also significant lung injury. This has to in positive and to harm in patients with respiratory patients without lung also is et a of alveolar cell of the for a of patients in a trial lung during These patients not have lung were to be at risk for in the with no between at or changes in were associated with and respiratory The clinical utility of this in those at risk of in larger more or is a highly of obstructive the for the development of et three of for age, and those with those with rapid and those without a more when compared with the However, only those with showed a significant in when compared with the not the these studies were with the the provide an into the involved in the pathogenesis of and provide a for potential therapies to this studies for positive et showed that were associated with and therapeutic compared with were also found to have greater during than was found to be associated with during additional from the on the may also have to this The highlight the importance of when and the of therapy if As an of is as a in the development and progression of disease. In a and et showed that therapeutic a significant and relevant in of the this into remains to be from trials the and the with in and trial provide important and into this the the has the medical in gene therapies for patients with These have been to specific of fibrosis and have been shown to provide significant clinical the of mutations in patients The prevalence of mutations varies between and the has important studies the in the diagnosis of and the mutations found in and In the diagnosis may be by an clinical and a lack of of the In the lack of of and genetic the diagnosis and more These are also to an important most of The review of the and of in highlighted both the prevalence and the heterogeneity of mutations is the most common for of and although it is not in and it remains the most common for the of with diagnostic and the of new therapies in mutations be to provide of these promising therapies to patients with in the The difficulty in diagnosis also with and who have a positive diagnosis of The first of suggested that of may end with an diagnosis of and that of to the year of is important with and monitoring may be a now in clinical for patients with mutations in of patients with has been shown to the in forced volume in by in patients with a compared with patients who are for showing a and the of this therapy to the of therapy with little to for therapies in chronic disease when monitoring with of the authors reported a of compared with of the of the of therapy and the potential suggested in this study, there be of monitoring being into clinical for therapies in the is also by and of and in patients and their are now being In respiratory is recognized as to and and we the for and and in The have also the expansion of available therapy with the and Drug approval for a of a and a for with years and who are for The results of the clinical trials of this therapy that of in with showed a highly although in lung with an important in pulmonary and the therapy was well with no between the also the results from the gene therapy trial from the of a gene complex by for The study reported that the therapy was well and lung in the compared with the in the While these were they are and the of new may provide more clinical in the novel the results of by in epithelial cells and a It is a and changing time for new therapeutic It is now well recognized that is associated with with both and and have a review this year in the of in on the a response and the on the development of lung They also a review of current treatment and the of of treatment in is to lung disease and and et showed that a new the for that a to the of on the and on the was both and and this may also to more in the of lung time in and which patients are at risk is important to and The study of to provide important clinical and et report that in a the from the patients with a risk of in and of treatments between and the study lung in and in the United States and the have shown lung in the United States where there is a of and the need to we have in more has a of that remains as a The of of from patients with chronic with the demonstrated significant genetic with the same patient potential were to mutations the may also become from and to to again challenges for therapeutic study, the results from of a range of years in and suggested that of may be important in to the with for the development of future therapeutic of is of course and pulmonary are that the and the lung are and that in the with respiratory and the time a first pulmonary in As we increasing of and a of new to the may provide new et a that appears to have in with and is associated with the development of chronic disease of associated with have not to had predictive In a study increased of may be a promising with and respiratory in and age at the time of to from has now been shown to lung in a in remains a challenge for studies in the et have shown that this is possible and respiratory forced in in and were to the of to has been associated with respiratory in both and with and without and was shown to be more common in with the complex between and the who their of key in fibrosis the and for educational from and has from to trials as a and also for on their
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".