MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2274644655 · doi:10.1177/0898264315615575

Comparing the Overall Health, Stress, and Characteristics of Canadians with Early-Onset and Late-Onset Dementia

2015· article· en· W2274644655 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Sheila Novek, Shahin Shooshtari, Verena Menec

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Aging and Health · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsDementiaGerontologyPsychologyStress (linguistics)MedicinePsychiatryClinical psychologyDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: Dementia is increasingly recognized as a public health priority, but little is known about persons with early-onset dementia (EOD). The objectives of this article are (a) to compare the socio-demographic and health characteristics of people with EOD and late-onset dementia (LOD) and (b) to examine the relationships between EOD and overall health and life stress. METHOD: Data were from the Survey on Living With Neurological Conditions in Canada (SLNCC). Logistic regression models were used to identify the characteristics associated with EOD and LOD, and to assess the impact of EOD on overall health and life stress. RESULTS: Compared with LOD, individuals with EOD were more likely to be male, to have a mood disorder, and to have a longer illness duration. EOD was associated with high life stress, but not with negative overall health. DISCUSSION: This study identified attributes associated with EOD that have important implications for service planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.959

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.290 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Aging and HealthSame topicDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchFrench-language works237,207