MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2274926769

Distinguishing sex of Bison bison bison using discriminant function analysis

2004· article· en· W2274926769 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
D. H. G. Walde

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Archaeology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBison bisonDiscriminant function analysisLinear discriminant analysisStatisticBiologyDemographyZoologyEcologyStatisticsMathematicsSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sex ratio of prey has long been recognized as an important statistic for analysis of hunting and processing decisions made by bison hunters. Methods for assigning sex to bison bones, often involving the analysis of complete single elements such as metapodials, have been developed. Seasonal nutritional differences between the sexes may have been a factor in decision-making by hunters. Because extracting nutrition from bone requires breakage, methods that can assign sex to fragmented bones are required to test this conclusion. Sex determination equations derived from discriminant function analysis of known sex Bison bison bison for the proximal and distal ends of long bones are presented. The equations are applicable only to materials less than 6,000 years old.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.939

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ArchaeologySame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207